Where's the love for Kenneth Faried, Reggie? |
The
NBA is known as being a superstar friendly league. LeBron James, Kevin Durant, Kobe Bryant amongst
others are obviously the names put on the marquee and rightfully so. The large market teams regularly are the ones
on ABC or ESPN. The only time a team
like the Nuggets get thrown a bone is when they are playing a team like Chicago
or one of the LA teams. Despite them
being a team that has made a playoff appearance in nine consecutive seasons,
the NBA simply does not show teams like this.
It’s always confused me. Good
basketball is good basketball, regardless of a big name or big market.
Two of the NBA's biggest stars: LeBron James and Kevin Durant |
So
do team like the Nuggets need a superstar to get national attention or some
love from the refs? There are rumors of
the Nuggets trying to make a run at Kevin Garnett before the trade deadline
hits. I can’t help but wonder why. Why move young, talented pieces (Danilo
Gallinari, Wilson Chandler or Kenneth Faried) for an aged superstar? Would that move make Denver an immediate
title contender? Absolutely not. Garnett is in the twilight of his
career. He’s had an amazing career, but
we’re a year or two away from a very noticeable decline in his game. Sure he’s a marketable star, but Denver had
that with Carmelo Anthony and didn’t win a title. Heck, they only escaped the first round of
the playoffs once.
The
sad thing is that David Stern got drunk on big market/big names when the league
was sputtering badly in the 70’s. Next
thing you know, Boston had Larry Bird and Los Angeles had Magic Johnson. The next evolution was Michael Jordan in
Chicago. The NBA had three transcendent
stars in three of their largest markets.
They never changed their focus after that. McDonald’s, Gatorade, Adidas and other
national sponsors flocked to these players.
While their skills and marketability were not questioned, there were
other guys marketable that did not get the same attention. The NBA wanted to focus on Bird, Johnson and
Jordan. Everyone else followed suit.
The
aforementioned Garnett had his best individual seasons in Minnesota,
but the stories from the NBA focused more on the Shaquille O’Neal led
Lakers. It proved to me that it doesn’t
matter if you have a superstar, unless you’re in a market they’ve decided to
focus on. Look at the current playoff
picture. There are teams filled with
players most casual fans haven’t heard of, but are some of the best in the
league. Indiana, Memphis, Denver, Golden
State all have complete teams that are fun to watch. They all have guys that could make a mark on
the national stage, if only given the chance.
Kevin Garnett as league MVP |
There
has been a small shift, with the emergence of Oklahoma City. They may be the test case for properly
promoting in a small market. The fact is
winning attracts viewers. Promote a
winning team, whether they have a hyped name or not, and people will
watch. The small market is really a dead
concept because the game is so available everywhere. NBA League Pass
has made every game available everywhere.
Why not rotate the national games to get exposure for other
franchises? That might also help prevent
players bouncing to big markets in free agency.
They’ll already have their exposure, which helps their brand.
The
one thing that needs to be learned is that if they promote stars in each
market, they grow the game. I haven’t
met anyone who has watched Kenneth Faried play and not come away impressed. He’s fun to watch. Most teams have a guy or two that could be a
“star” if promoted properly.
Why
do certain players become superstars? At
the core, it will always be about their talent.
There has to be something else that pushes them to the next level, and
that is where the NBA marketing team needs to step up. We need to hear about and see more on players
like Faried, David Lee, Marc Gasol and Paul George. I know, in my heart, that if people watch
these players once they’ll continue watching them after that. Basketball fans, while loyal to their teams
or players, love watching hoops. Give us
something good to watch and we’ll check it out.
Faried and the other 2013 Dunk Contest participants |
For
those who think that big names mean wins and championships, I give you the
2012-13 Los Angeles Lakers.
Championships are not earned on paper, but on the court. It would be nice if we would hear stories
about teams playing well, instead of the drama between two “superstars” in a
big market. Then again, controversy
generates interest and that’s why the Lakers will continue leading off
SportsCenter despite putting out a poor product.
At
least we get to see Kenneth
Faried in the dunk contest over All-Star weekend. Maybe, just maybe, his performance will wake
some people up. Regardless, I’ll
continue to enjoy the fantastic on-court play of these teams so rarely
mentioned.
Maybe
one day others will join me.
No comments:
Post a Comment